> I think it would be easier to critique the gallery's photographs if a little more information was given with the images. > Some do have information, and I appreciate that. Others don't have any comments, such as what the photographer's object of taking that particular photo was, or if it was just an impulse shot. > It could just be me, but I'd like to see comments from the photographers. Marilyn My take is sligtly different. If an image needs an explantion (or even a title for that matter) then its already failed on one level. It's quite interesting to know *where* shots were taken from an educational viewpoint. It's also good to have an explanation with a sub-standard image where the point was to demonstrate a technique etc. By and large though I prefer the pictures to speak for themselves ... but then again, I'm not about to attempt to review them ;o) Bob
