Elgenper <elgenper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Apart from one or two tests, I never used it; if shutter lag for the > first exposure is already close to unacceptable, how about eight > frames, where the preferred one might come anywhere in the series? If you're already into serious shutter lag territory, then you're using "stochastic shooting" anyway, and shooting long strings, auto-deleting the less sharp ones, and then picking among them for ones that look good, pretty much can't be beat. Except by buying a more responsive camera. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
