"Emily L. Ferguson" <elf@xxxxxxxx> wrote/replied to: >I think the presentation of thumbs is a very good thing. I wouldn't >get rid of them. They really enable to viewer to decide how much >time to spend in an "album" I would always argue against thumbs. I feel they allow people to click too quickly through your albums. However, displaying only one image at a time does this as well, but I feel the thumb being there entices a person to click on it before fully appreciating the last image. And it's not needed, so why detract from the main image viewed. I'm very curious as to what others think of thumbs vs. my method of fully showing the gallery from top to bottom. I know my way takes longer to load, but I like the idea of the viewer being able to scroll back up or down to view again images. Without any hurry. example: http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/new_stuff4.html Comments on my method vs. one at a time galleries appreciated.
