Rick Kessler <rick@rickkessler.com> writes: > I just brought up a new site www.placescapes.com > <http://www.placescapes.com/> ... <snip> > I would appreciate any feedback on the content and presentation. I think all the large text looks rather amateurish. If you haven't got much text, well, hmm, the _best_ way to optimise for search engines is to add more text. Then more text. Oops, what's this? The explanation of what's on the back of the placemat could be much better done with a picture of the back of an actual placemat. The graphic you're using - http://www.placescapes.com/images/back_layout_copy.jpg ... is *ouch!* 18.5K. Here's a png file you could replace it with that is 1.3K: http://imaginatorium.org/private/grid.png I think it's a good idea to take the time to understand the different strategies for image formats, and why jpeg is so good for photos, and so bad for most other things. Sounds like a good idea anyway: you don't give much detail on _how_ you are going to manufacture them, and there are no product shots yet[?]. Good luck! Oh, did I mention, add more text. Brian Chandler ---------------- geo://Sano.Japan.Planet_3 Jigsaw puzzles from Japan at: http://imaginatorium.org/shop/
