> I just don't get it....I wonder what are the TRUE reasons why you people > refuse to install a Flash player... Simple: why install anything you don't need. "Why can't you get that ?" is the question I'm left with. Exactly what (in terms of information transfer) does Flash give you? So far, from machines where it is installed, it just seems to give a lower information/presentation ratio. Hit the back button to a Flash site for instance: watch the whole bluddy presentation again. Do that on HTML and you have instant refresh. Your site is about your photos, or is it about showing how clever you are with Flash? Which. >.I just wonder...what do you mean you > don't need it? Ok, fine it's your choice but.... it's also your loss. I mean > this is a very simple and small thing with so many benefits....but as you > said it's your choice not to benefit from such a simple thing. At work it is not my choice. My employer can see no reason to install it and under XP (Thanks Mr Gates) there is no way we (users) can overcome the group policies. What do we miss? Nothing. It is just about fluff over content. Pretty transforms. Multimedia experience. Fluff all the same. Bob
