Gregory Fraser <Gregory.Fraser@pwgsc.gc.ca> wrote/replied to: >I shot my first non-family portrait session on the weekend. The model is a friend of mine and hopefully she'll still be a friend after I show her the prints. The session started off great. I entered her house and she told me to let her dog sniff me. Somehow I thought that meant let her sniff my hand like every one of the other million dogs I've met but no, this dog is a little different. Apparently she's offended by human hands and the little bitch clamped down on me then took off so fast I never saw it coming. Live and learn. > >Anyway, the only lens I have greater than 50mm is a Tamron 80-200 zoom. I wasn't expecting much from it but it was the only thing I have close to a portrait lens. The worst part of the shots is not the poor lighting and its not the fact that in over half the shots at least one eye is closed and its not the fact that I know squat about directing models and my friend has never modeled before. The worst part is that damn Tamron lens is too sharp! I was worried it would be blurry but it shows every single pore on her face. > >So now I'm wondering how to get rid of that in Photoshop. Do I select a large area of skin like an entire cheek and perform a gaussian blur? Should I work in small patches or as large as I can get? Is blurring not the way to go at all? > >Greg Fraser Blur the entire photo, then go back with the history brush and remove the blurr from the eyes. Work carefully with low density and soft edges. This way you can paint it the way you like rather than trying to mask it will look more natural. Don't go overboard on the blurring either, start with just a bit of blur. Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/
