Jim Davis <ydavis@hkg.odn.ne.jp> writes: > LScottPht@aol.com wrote/replied to: > > > > ><< However, Nikon has come out with a nice wide angle zoom that matches > > up to the smaller sensor size. Canon has yet to do that. But we can > > only hope. I have the Canon 10D by the way. I don't mind a small > > sensor since I'm always shooting long tele stuff. I use my 20-35 zoom > > for wide angle stuff. Yes, it's not as wide as I'd like sometimes, but > > generally it gets me by pretty well. Extreme wide angle is not often a > > good choice, except for special type of shots. So you will have to > > look at maybe a new lens, or making do with the widest you have. > > > > >> > >Thanks! I have a 17-35mm. How wide do you think it would be if was used on > >17mm? It would just be nice if they made a camera that had everything. Of > >course, then it would be way out of my price range! > > Leslie, you will have to read some reviews but I think the camera is > 1.6X format. That would make 17mm into about 27mm. The Nikons are 1.5x; 1.6x is the Canon sub-frame sensor factor. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <dd-b@dd-b.net>, <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <noguns-nomoney.com> <www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera mailing lists: <dragaera.info/>
