Re: Minimizing pinhole image falloff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For a 4x5 image, 6.4 inches will give 1/3 stop fall off at the corners. 3
inches will give about 1 stop fall off.

Regards,
Bob...
--------------------------------------------
"Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused.  Men can go wrong with wine
and women.  Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?"
-Martin Luther

From: "Gregory Fraser" <Gregory.Fraser@pwgsc.gc.ca>


> I went to a web site that had a calculator for the image circle diameter
of pinhole setups. I calculated that a focal length of 3 inches would give
me an image circle that would cover 4x5 inch film. I forget the pinhole
diameter. Then I remembered how drastic the falloff is at the edges of
pinhole images so I thought perhaps by increasing the focal length, I would
have more of the brighter central part of the image and that would reduce
the effects of falloff. 'But wait,' I yelled, 'if this were the case
wouldn't Guy have been able to find a hotel room long enough to prevent the
falloff he experienced in Montreal? Certainly someone as intimate with
pinholes as Guy would know about that.'
>
> So, does the light falloff of a pinhole camera image follow an inverse
square rule? Will it always be an issue no matter how big your shoebox,
cigar tube or Quaker Oats box is?


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux