I don't think the level of radiation produced by a dirty bomb is likely to have a significant effect on any photography. Chris http://www.chrissdomain.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu [mailto:owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu]On Behalf Of PhotoRoy6@aol.com Sent: 13 February 2003 00:20 To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students Subject: Re: why does digital looks better? In a message dated 2/12/03 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, snapper@st-abbs.fsnet.co.uk writes: << Brian The D60 already produces better images than medium format. It must be true, I read it on the web ;o) P >> Is film or digital medium more likely to survive a radioactive dirty bomb? I feel most digital mediums are more likely to be damaged by a dirty bomb except for digital info that is stored on a CD?
