Re: Altered cameras for outter space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I found this resource link on the web; it, probably, will help in
understanding some of the factors for space photography.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/apollo.photechnqs.htm




Achal Pashine
Pediatric Immunology
Center for Clinical Sciences Research, Room 2120
269 Campus Drive
Stanford, CA 94305-5164

Tel: 1-650-498-7574
FAX: 1-650-498-6077


----- Original Message -----
From: "William S. Pettit" <wpettit@ix.netcom.com>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@ase-listmail.rit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: Altered cameras for outter space


> Also special lubricants are required to prevent outgassing and provide
extremely low temperature
> performance.
>
> Bill
>
> "Robert G. Earnest" wrote:
> >
> > Probably so that one might use them with large gloves and a helmet on.
> >
> > r
> >
> > Gordo wrote:
> > >
> > > I read that cameras that go into space (Apollos and Shuttles) need to
be
> > > modified. Yet, I understand that, besides being light-tight, a photo
camera
> > > should basically need a pressure plate to keep the negative flat and a
> > > shutter. No big deal, apparently.
> > >
> > > So, how / why do cameras that go out to space need to be altered?
> > >
> > > You know, trying to find out, just in case...
> > >
> > > (next thread would be "Re:photo ops in Mars, anyone?"  :-P
> > >
> > > Alberto Tirado
>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux