Luis, Are you suggesting a reshoot for those who were on Raphael and Betsy. That have a Betsy-2 and a Raphael-2 circulates out to the same list of participants and that these participants somehow agree that they will make every effort to speed up the process. It seems that there is enough frustration in both these groups that it should be no problem to get that commitment. If this is what you have in mind, you have my vote. I say: YES! I have no particular attachment to the picture I took. I know that I can do an equally bad one on any occasion. We could even rearrange the routing so as to minimize the overall distance that these cameras travel in order to speed up the process. Wouldn't it be fun to try that? Guy ----- Original Message ----- From: "*- CHILLED DELIRIUM-*" <sfunp@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 7:24 AM Subject: Re: PTC Project > > > Months have been wasted waiting on Jan to do a scan. Now months > are being wasted for JF to mail a CD. I think Rob Miracle has the > right idea: Let's sidestep JF altogether and take control of the > project back. The problem with begging JF to do this is that he > likes to hear people beg, so the more one begs, the less likely > he is to do anything. By now, using 4-8 camera bodies, we > could be almost through the project, minus Mr. Faul. At least we would > have a real-world contingency plan in progress so that no matter > what JF does/doesn't do, the PTC comes to a good and fulfilling > conclusion. > > --- Luis >
