JUPITER lense

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi all!
i just purchased (for almost nothing) an old russian screw-mount Jupiter 
lense, and i wonder if you have prior experience with such lenses.
it is a 85mm f/2 one, very compact(short) with a too bulbous front element, 
a 49mm filter size, and a reverse set up.(focusing ring close to the camera, 
then the stop-down ring, then the aperture selection one.)obvioulsy the 
glass is uncoated.oh yes, it is a manual focus one.

it is just the lense i need for the distances i shoot concerts these days. 
and is the only way i could get a a f/2 cheap. that cheap that i won't mind 
usinf it for paper weight if it proves to be a fluke.

i donot know if it is used 'cos the plastic cylindrical box and the lense 
itself smell of grease. in fact there is old grease between the elements 
module and the rest of the lense body which screw off. there are even traces 
of grease among the 14 shutter leafs.

i ahd no chance to shoot a test roll with it but i did mount the body on the 
tripod and run a comparison test with all my lenses.
here are the results:

              f/22  f/16  f/11  f/8   f/5.6  f/4   f/3.5  f/2.8   f/2
jupiter 85mm = --   1/15  1/30  1/90  1/180  1/350  --    1/1000  1/1500
makinon @85mm=1/8   1/15  1/30  1/90  1/180   --    1/750  --      --
pentax  @80mm=1/15  1/30  1/60  1/125 1/250   --    --     --      --

note that the shutter speeds run close with my jupiter and makinon ones, and 
are one stop faster than the pentax(though in practice overexposure of 1 
stop is needed for the makinon). also note the ONE and a HALF stop 
difference between f/11 and f/8 in both the non-Pentax lenses. that i cannot 
explain...

so what do you think?


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux