Bayless Kirtley wrote: > Yes, I'm afraid you're gonna be out of luck on finding the array type > in any > of > the smaller embedded databases. Honestly, the beg project I've been on > for a > year or so has used Postgres right through full development and testing. > It's > not hard to start and stop the database whenever I need to although I > usually > just leave it running. > Even if you find one supporting all the same SQL syntax that you are using, another database implementation could, in some rare circumstances, return slightly different data for the same query. In particular odd situations like this arise around nulls. Conceivably this could happen between versions of PostgreSQL and running such unit tests to test your code's expectations against a real database guards against this possibility. Eric -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
