Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Long wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> > I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for 
> > reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
> >
> > Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant 
> > a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have 
> > guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for 
> > me?
> >
> > -- 
> > * Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
> >
> I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have 
> transactions and subqueries were not existent.  The features I was 
> looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
> 
> I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.

Monty is quite supportive of Postgres.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux