Scott Marlowe wrote:
No doubt. The pgsql community rocks. In fact the support on this mailing list is top notch and free. :)On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason Long <mailing.list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Greg Smith wrote: I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for reference in case it gets forcibly removed... Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me? -- * Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions. I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL. "Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with PostgreSQL. :)It's free. The pgsql community, however, is priceless. Thank you a million times over to anyone that has give me advice here. I have never gotten bad advice from this list. |
