Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

[Jason Long <mailing.list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Greg Smith wrote:

I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for reference in case it gets forcibly removed...

Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have transactions and subqueries were not existent.  The features I was looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.

I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.

"Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with PostgreSQL.  :)