On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Kamil Srot wrote: > When this problem appeared for the first time, I had clearly the > wraparound problem... I did vacuum it and partially restored the data... I don't think vacuum would "fix" a wrap around problem in the way you describe. I don't think you have a wrap problem. > From above mentioned duplications of relatio names and what Tom wrote > recently (doesn't see like WA problem), it looks like the relation name > is/gets corrupted in some way and this corruption is internally taken > over to another instance of relation named the same but in another > database... but I know - it's too speculative. No, it just doesn't work that way. Are these all shared on the same hardware? Are you sure you're not having other problems? A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
