Naz Gassiep <naz@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Example discussion with customer: > ... > Finally, in the absence of security concerns or performance issues (and > I mean the "we can't afford to buy better hardware" type edge of the > envelope type issues) there is zero *need* to upgrade. This line of argument ignores the fact that newer versions often contain fixes for data-loss-grade bugs. Now admittedly that is usually an argument for updating to x.y.z+1 rather than x.y+1, but I think it destroys any reasoning on the basis of "if it ain't broke". regards, tom lane
