Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can. > Perhaps we should switch down the DEBUG level of it, at least until we > know what happens? That would have to wait on another update release, or at least someone being willing to build a nonstandard executable for Windows, so let's first see if people are willing to do the DEBUG5 bit. regards, tom lane