Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> But yeah, that's probably a good idea. A quick look at the code says we >> should at least ask people who have this problem to give it a run with >> logging at DEBUG5 which should then log exactly what the errorcode was. >> Or are you seeing more places that need such logging first? > > DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can. Perhaps we should switch down the DEBUG level of it, at least until we know what happens? //Magnus
