Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But yeah, that's probably a good idea. A quick look at the code says we > should at least ask people who have this problem to give it a run with > logging at DEBUG5 which should then log exactly what the errorcode was. > Or are you seeing more places that need such logging first? DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can. regards, tom lane
