Yes - this statement actually came from a helpful soul who had replied but did not realise I was talking about pltcl. I am looking into the "unknown" command because I believe there may be security issues with using "spource" or "package" commands to access proc libraries - and that the "unknown" command and its magic tables is the way to make those libs reside on the server and totally portable. Am I correct? Carlo "Tom Lane" <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:18182.1154537565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > "Ian Harding" <iharding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> PLTCL was taken out of the core distribution, and is not in contrib. > > I think you confused pltcl with pgtcl. Totally different things > (pltcl is server side, pgtcl client side). > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
