Search Postgresql Archives

Re: NOT HAVING clause?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew - Supernews wrote:
On 2006-01-24, Will Glynn <wglynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You might try:

SELECT some_column
 FROM some_table
 GROUP BY some_column
 HAVING SUM(CASE WHEN sort_order=1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0;


SELECT some_column
  FROM some_table
 GROUP BY some_column
HAVING every(sort_order <> 1);

every() is in 8.1 at least (can't recall when it was introduced); it's the
same as bool_and(), i.e. an aggregate that returns true only if all inputs
are true. Why isn't there a corresponding any(), I wonder? (bool_or does
exist)

Unfortunately we still use 7.4, but I realized this morning that this should work too (not tried yet):

SELECT some_column
  FROM some_table
 GROUP BY some_column
HAVING MIN(sort_order) > 1;

As our sort_orders start from 1.

--
Alban Hertroys
alban@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
   7500 AK Enschede

//Showing your Vision to the World//


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux