Search Postgresql Archives

Re: NOT HAVING clause?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2006-01-24, Will Glynn <wglynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You might try:
>
> SELECT some_column
>   FROM some_table
>   GROUP BY some_column
>   HAVING SUM(CASE WHEN sort_order=1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0;

SELECT some_column
  FROM some_table
 GROUP BY some_column
HAVING every(sort_order <> 1);

every() is in 8.1 at least (can't recall when it was introduced); it's the
same as bool_and(), i.e. an aggregate that returns true only if all inputs
are true. Why isn't there a corresponding any(), I wonder? (bool_or does
exist)

It should be possible to define bool_and() or every() in the usual way as
a custom aggregate even on versions that don't have them builtin.

-- 
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux