On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:21:31PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:07:47AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:47:26AM +0300, WireSpot wrote: > > > But... will the resulting dump be consistent as far as foreign > > > keys are concerned? Or will the current -t warning still apply > > > (YMMV as to the consistency of the resulting dump)? > > > > I think the latter is better. This is solidly in the realm of > > prying off cover plates, and the warning is already there :) > > I think it would be good to include an option that only does > checking and doesn't actually try to dump anything. That would make > it easier to ensure your config file is correct. Could you flesh this out a bit? What would this option produce in the (imho most common) case where dependencies weren't all taken care of? Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@xxxxxxxxxx http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
