On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:07:47AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:47:26AM +0300, WireSpot wrote: > > But... will the resulting dump be consistent as far as foreign keys > > are concerned? Or will the current -t warning still apply (YMMV as > > to the consistency of the resulting dump)? > > I think the latter is better. This is solidly in the realm of prying > off cover plates, and the warning is already there :) I think it would be good to include an option that only does checking and doesn't actually try to dump anything. That would make it easier to ensure your config file is correct. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend