Search Postgresql Archives

Re: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Ccc.  blowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. Graciasblowjobhttps://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va94dZyIXnlxXagThf0G

Lea también
sBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. GraciasBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. GraciasblowjobsBuenos días . Pblowjobsor Buenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. Graciasfavor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. GraciasBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. GraciasBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. Gracias

El jue, 29 de feb de 2024, 21:37, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
Hi, Mark.

At Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:39:49 +0000, Mark Schloss <Mark.Schloss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> Thanks for looking at this. I think I complicated things by
> including barman. I was just wanting to point out each primary
> streams to two locations - the walreceiver on the replica and the
> walreciver used by barman. We think the reason the barman
> WAL-receiver didn't fail is because there is no apply of the WAL in
> Barman but the Standby is applying and it's WAL-receiver got
> terminated, so the barman server can be taken out of this picture
> completely, they were just there as a by-product in trying to
> determine the effect.  We are only interested in the killing of the
> standby wal-receiver and that the pg_waldump showed the failing lsn
> was a commit.

It seems that an issue raised in the -hackers thread [1] might be the
same issue as yours. The discussion might be a help for you, although
it's not clear what is happening yet.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFh8B%3DmozC%2Be1wGJq0H%3D0O65goZju%2B6ab5AU7DEWCSUA2OtwDg%40mail.gmail.com

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux