Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, apparently pg_available_extension_versions already had those > fields so all the required infrastructure was already there. I just > added the exact same fields to pg_available_extensions, see attached > patch. The reason that pg_available_extensions has only the fields it has is that these other values are potentially extension-version-dependent. I do not think we can accept this patch. (Strictly speaking, the "comment" might be version-specific too, but there's less chance of printing a critically misleading value there.) regards, tom lane
