On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions. > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user. Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility. There is a bit more that we could consider though? For example, what about "relocatable" and "requires"? -- Michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
