On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Alessandro Dentella <sandro.dentella@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > st 23. 9. 2020 v 10:38 odesílatel Alessandro Dentella < > > sandro.dentella@xxxxxxxxx> napsal: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on > > > behalf > > > of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use PostgreSQL. > > > > > > I'd like to understand if what the team replies to him is correct or not. > > > > > > The final project should work with Python (we know it just works) and with > > > c#. > > > The team states that: > > > > > > "It does not exist a native driver. You need to use ODBC, that is an old > > > technology and doesn't give warranties in terms of security, reliability > > > and > > > performance." > > > > > > Is it any true? is it biased? > > > > > > > https://kb.objectrocket.com/postgresql/how-to-install-psycopg2-in-windows-1460 > > > > So minimally psycopg2 - native driver for Python exists for Win > > Thanks Pavel, but psycopg2 (that I always use is just for Python). T > hey claim/complain that from c# there's no native solution. > > Personally I don't know even if ODBC is really to be considered a second class > choice. It sounds awkward to me that such a great db has flaws like this (I'm > NOT stating it *has* flaws) > > sandro Surely, it's a flaw in the C# ecosystem, not a flaw in the database? (assuming it's true, and assuming there's anything wrong with ODBC). :-) cheers, raf
