On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is > > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions. > > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily > > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user. > > Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility. There is a bit > more that we could consider though? For example, what about > "relocatable" and "requires"? +1, and also the schema (for non relocatable extensions).
