Greetings, * Guyren Howe (guyren@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Jun 2, 2020, at 14:16 , Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm sure there's things we can do to improve the performance of the FDW. > > Not sure we'll get to a point where we are actually cacheing information > > from the far side... but who knows, maybe if we arrange to have a > > notification sent whenever certain objects are updated... > > > > These things could be worked on independnetly, of course, no need to > > have one done before the other. > > By all means, let’s improve the FDW. But is it practical to make it possible to query across databases on the same server, in a similar manner to SQL Server, without needing FDW at all? If you'd like to try and figure out how to make that work, it could be theoretically possible, but I seriously doubt it'd be at all straight forward to do, or that it'd ultimately end up being worth it. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
