Greetings, * Ravi Krishna (sravikrishna@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Generally speaking, I discourage having lots of databases under one PG > > cluster for exactly these kinds of reasons. PG's individual clusters > > are relatively lightweight, after all. > > Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something > sqlserver excels at. Eh, that's something that I think we should be looking at supporting, by using FDWs, but I haven't tried to figure out how hard it'd be. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
