for pg_restore it is the same machine as well as newest version of Postgresql 12, so I assume the error is in pg_dump.
selects work no problem, I even dumped one table with COPY and it doesnt raise any issue. The other table however is probably too big to ever do this.
schema for one table:
CREATE TABLE table1 (
foreign_id integer,
action character varying(10),
numarr smallint[]
);
and other table:
CREATE TABLE log (
id integer NOT NULL,
place character varying(50),
place_no integer,
"time" character varying(80),
action character varying(100),
"user" character varying(50),
place_definition character varying(10),
place_definition2 character varying(50),
place_definition3 character varying(30)
);
On 12/16/19 9:46 AM, Sar wrote:
> Hi,
> I have database on Windows Server, running postgresql 10 and I've run
> pg_dump with options: -Fc --verbose -d db_name --file "E:\backup.sql"
> -T some_table.
> Now when I run pg_restore, also on windows server with postgresql 12, or
> on the same original server with postgresql 10, using options
> --data-only --verbose -j 8,
> or without jobs, but selecting some specific few tables with -t option I
> get follwing error:
Which Postgres version of pg_dump/pg_restore are you using to do above?
> error: pg_restore: error: found unexpected block ID (0) when reading
> data -- expected 3142
> This error will only happen on very few tables, most run fine.
What happens if you SELECT from these tables in the Postgres 10 instance?
Can you show the schema definition for one or more of the problem tables?
> Currently, I'm running without jobs and without tables selected with -t,
> however I haven't gotten to the specific table that causes the trouble
> (the restore will take days), however I already fear when it comes to
> that table the same error will trigger.
> I guess this could serve as a possible bug report as well, but any
> advice as to what I can do is appreciated.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
