Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/11/19 1:24 PM, Perumal Raj wrote:
Hi Adrian

What was the full message?

            autovacuum: VACUUM <table name >(to prevent wraparound)

Though i am running vacuum manually (nowadays) and autovacuum is running perfectly once its threshold reaches.

What will happen if my DB reaches 200M transaction age again ? ( Here my understanding is no dead tuples to cleanup --- I may be missing full concept , Please correct me if i am wrong) .

What will be impact to DB ( Performance ) During Vacuum freeze ( My Assumption is autovacuum will run "vacuum freeze" once DB age reached 200M ) ?

I would read this:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/routine-vacuuming.html#VACUUM-FOR-WRAPAROUND

I believe it will answer most of your questions.


When should i consider to increase pg_settings value with respect to Autovacuum ?

Regards,





--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux