On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:24:29AM +1000, Julian Paul wrote: > It's overly long and convoluted. > > "inclusivity" Is a ideologue buzzword of particular individuals that offer > very little value apart from excessive policing of speech and behaviour > assumed to be a problem where none exist. > > "Personal attacks and negative comments on personal characteristics are > unacceptable, and will not be permitted. Examples of personal > characteristics include, but are not limited to age, race, national origin > or ancestry, religion, gender, or sexual orientation." > > So just leaving it at "Personal attacks" and ending it there won't do > obviously. I'm a big advocate of people sorting out there own personal > disputes in private but... > > "further personal attacks (public or *private*);" > > ...lets assume people don't have the maturity for that and make it all > public. > > "may be considered offensive by fellow members" - Purely subjective and > irrelevant to a piece of community software. You might notice that a bullet list was removed and those example items were added 18 months ago: https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Code_of_Conduct&diff=31924&oldid=29402 I realize that putting no examples has its attractions, but some felt that having examples would be helpful. I am not a big fan of the "protected groups" concept because it is often exploited, which is why they are listed more as examples. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
