On 18/09/18 20:27, Dave Page wrote:
The PostgreSQL Core team are pleased to announce that following a long
consultation process, the project’s Code of Conduct (CoC) has now been
finalised and published at https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/coc/.
Please take time to read and understand theCoC, which is intended to
ensure that PostgreSQL remains an open and enjoyable project for anyone
to join and participate in.
A Code of Conduct Committee has been formed to handle any complaints.
This consists of the following volunteers:
- Stacey Haysler (Chair)
-LætitiaAvrot
- Vik Fearing
- Jonathan Katz
- Ilya Kosmodemiansky
We would like to extend our thanks and gratitude to Stacey Haysler for
her patience and expertise in helping develop the Code of Conduct,
forming the committee and guiding the work to completion.
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
http://www.postgresql.org/
<http://www.postgresql.org/>
It's overly long and convoluted.
"inclusivity" Is a ideologue buzzword of particular individuals that
offer very little value apart from excessive policing of speech and
behaviour assumed to be a problem where none exist.
"Personal attacks and negative comments on personal characteristics are
unacceptable, and will not be permitted. Examples of personal
characteristics include, but are not limited to age, race, national
origin or ancestry, religion, gender, or sexual orientation."
So just leaving it at "Personal attacks" and ending it there won't do
obviously. I'm a big advocate of people sorting out there own personal
disputes in private but...
"further personal attacks (public or *private*);"
...lets assume people don't have the maturity for that and make it all
public.
"may be considered offensive by fellow members" - Purely subjective and
irrelevant to a piece of community software.
There is much more in this CoC that is concerning and appears to follow
the same methodology to be nothing more than a green light to those who
have made their way within the inner hierarchy to run it like a overly
politicized dictatorship.
I'm not sure if there is likely to be a large concerning number of
people that are likely to violate this CoC. However, it is written in a
such a way that will open it up to heavy handed abuse.
The fact that this CoC made it this far to be actually published is
concerning and IMO alludes to requests for feedback to not be taken
seriously. In fact I'm somewhat certain of this.
I assumed this was a open community with a large number of voluntary
members. Remember this is a piece of software most end users don't know
or even should care about.
K.I.S.S. That's my feedback.
Regards, Julian.
