On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> What do you think about the patch attached?
>
> Looks OK. Should it mention specifically "On a hot standby" rather than "On
> a standby"? Otherwise people might be left confused on how they are
> supposed to do this on a generic standby. It is the kind of thing which is
> obvious once you know it, but confusing the first time you encounter it.
Yes, right. Let's update as you suggest.
new version looks good.
Thanks,
Jeff
