On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > I think that pg_stat_wal_receiver should be crossreferenced in >> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/hot-standby.html, near the >> > same >> > place which it crossreferences table 9-79. That would make it more >> > discoverable. >> >> Hm. Hot standby may not involve streaming replication. What about a >> paragraph here instead? >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html#streaming-replication >> >> In the monitoring subsection, we could tell that on a standby the WAL >> receiver status can be retrieved from this view when changes are >> streamed. What do you think? > > > That works for me. What do you think about the patch attached? <para> You can retrieve a list of WAL sender processes via the - <link linkend="monitoring-stats-views-table"> + <link linkend="monitoring-stats-dynamic-views-table"> <literal>pg_stat_replication</></link> view. Large differences between In the previous paragraph I have noticed that the link reference is incorrect. pg_stat_replication is listed under monitoring-stats-dynamic-views-table. -- Michael
Attachment:
walreceiver-doc.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
