Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/28/2017 01:34 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-04-28 01:29:14 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I can confirm this observation. I bought the Intel 750 NVMe SSD last year,
the device has 1GB DDR3 cache on it (power-loss protected), can do ~1GB/s of
sustained O_DIRECT sequential writes. But when running pgbench, I can't push
more than ~300MB/s of WAL to it, no matter what I do because of
WALWriteLock.

Hm, interesting.  Even if you up wal_buffers to 128MB, use
synchronous_commit = off, and play with wal_writer_delay/flush_after?


I think I've tried things like that, but let me do some proper testing. I'll report the numbers in a few days.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux