>> Participation does not need to be limited to copy-editing. Of all the >> ways to develop a community CoC, we're engaged in just about the worst >> possible one right now. > > so what would be a better way of developing this ? Of interesting note, the Ruby community is currently considering switching to a CoC inspired directly from this draft of a Postgres CoC. The extremely long conversation can be viewed at: https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
