On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:48 PM, "David E. Wheeler" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that’s planned for a separate document, to be linked. I think those need to put in place at the same time. It's very hard to judge how good or bad a CoC is absent a reporting mechanism. I'd respectfully suggest that we table the discussion of the CoC text at this point, let the high passions moderate a bit, and talk about the process. That is the detail in which the devils will live. -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
