On Jan 24, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You are wrong and the fact that we have gone from a motion style, to a story style, to a continually and incrementally improving draft proves it. This is the largest feature the community has tried to design and implement. It is going to take a little time. "The document has changed" is not a consensus emerging. A significant portion of the participants don't want a CoC at all, and they are feeling ignored. A significant portion of the participants don't want this CoC, because they feel it's not strong enough, and they're feeling ignored. Those two parties are not trivial; in fact, they make up most of the people who are commenting right now. > This shouldn't cause any rifts. And, yet, it is. > If you don't want to constructively participate in the development of this feature, nobody is asking you to. Participation does not need to be limited to copy-editing. Of all the ways to develop a community CoC, we're engaged in just about the worst possible one right now. -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
