-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 David E. Wheeler wrote: (...good rebuttals to specific points of the proposed Code of Conduct.. > This document sounds like something written by well-meaning folks who don� > want to be misunderstood. There is a lot here to let violators protect > themselves in the event of a reported violation, but little to make > vulnerable people feel safe. It is the latter that needs to be the message > of the CoC, not the former. Thanks, David, I confess I hadn't seen it in that light before, but you make some good points. I think this may indeed be one of those times that we do not attempt to "roll our own". Or at the very least, we should strive to understand how other communities arrived at their Codes and why it is working for them. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201601221729 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAlaircQACgkQvJuQZxSWSshcsgCeMsyRvP24YbFD/OTuvQ20/PEf PHIAn2Gu3ectm6o/L2npNMy+cFBhvD2b =p/1f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
