Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Building PostgreSQL 9.6devel sources with Microsoft Visual C++ 2015?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Paquier wrote:
How long do you think it would take for MS 1820 to be fixed and out?
Maybe never.
I
wouldn't personally mind telling to people trying to compile with 1800
that we cannot support it because it is buggy. That's one less wart to
have forever in the code.
For the user, this is a bad response. In addition, many of the new features msvc, due to which the user must use it. Also, I think the current code looks like a hack. It's okay if we for some time to add one more hack. But as I wrote above, I will try to find a better solution.
While I was not going to back down: CMake+MSVC2015

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux