On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Ick. Even if that works today, it seems absolutely guaranteed to fail >> in future, as soon as Microsoft either puts back the visible declaration >> or changes the struct contents. If they've made a conscious decision >> to not export the struct anymore, it's likely because they intend to >> change it ... so I'd put the half-life of this "fix" at no more than one >> Visual Studio release. > > Yes. You right. But at the moment, it's better than nothing. In addition, we > can then do something like this: > #if _MSC_VER >= 1800 && _MSC_VER < 1820 > > after MS push fix. Urg. That's just ugly. >> Hopefully, if they removed the visible declaration intentionally, they >> provided some other way to get at those locale names. That's what we >> need to be looking for, not hoping that direct access to undocumented >> structures will continue to work. > > It's more like a simple bug after refactoring. But I will try find another > way. (I don't like undocumented structures) How long do you think it would take for MS 1820 to be fixed and out? I wouldn't personally mind telling to people trying to compile with 1800 that we cannot support it because it is buggy. That's one less wart to have forever in the code. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
