Dear all, Please let's not be pedantic and expect absolute legalistic perfection in the wordings that has been put forward. No doubt we all understand the spirit and the purpose of the wording. Which is when we are consulting in the community we are not to here to discuss other people's gender, sexuality etc. Joshua can I put forward that two further points should be considered for possible inclusion. One is prejudices towards one's own religious persuasion and secondly age related should not be part of discussions or reasoning. We are effectively here to focus on helping each other and improving the overall functioning of postgresql etc in a very practical manner. Please let's move on. Best Regards -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karsten Hilbert Sent: 11 January 2016 22:21 To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC) On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:00:22PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is > free comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, > physical appearance, body size or race. ... for of _off-topic_ comments related to ... Since I am using PostgreSQL for storing Electronic Medical Record data I fear I will need to be able to discuss schema layout related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, and race. Karsten Hilbert -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general