Alan Hodgson wrote > Well, yeah. The point was that you possibly could run it for a while to > "catch > up" without taking a new base backup if you desired. You should also keep > copies of it for PITR. Something like this - delayed replication <http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-delayed.html> might help. I could say lag by 12 hours, or 10000 transactions... -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-Point-In-Time-Recovery-tp5775717p5775997.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
