Alan Hodgson wrote > That's basically what warm standby's do, isn't it? As long as they keep > recovery open it should work. A warn standby will be almost in sync with the primary, right? So recovery to point-in-time (like 10 AM this morning) won't be possible. We need a base, but it shouldn't be so old that it takes hours to catchup- that was my thought. As John mentioned, looking at the WAL/transaction numbers, time to recover etc need to be looked at. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-Point-In-Time-Recovery-tp5775717p5775874.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
