I wrote: > Meh. That character renders as \310 in your mail, which is not an > assigned code in ISO 8859-1. The numerically corresponding Unicode > value would be U+0090, which is an unspecified control character. Oh, scratch that, apparently I can't do hex/octal arithmetic in my head first thing in the morning. It's really U+00C8 which is perfectly valid. I can't see a reason why that character and only that character would be problematic --- have you done systematic testing to confirm that that's the only should-be-LATIN1 character that fails? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
